data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f845f/f845fe3cf60394ebc1e991d04275f5f1e98e227c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad7a2/ad7a2bd933e1d8b96aef1c5a0f51d37b9eb5da87" alt="The swan neck flask experiment"
Now other scientists had done experiments attempting to overthrow the science, Lazzaro Spallanzani had done countless experiments to prove that there was no mysterious life-force that permeated everything, but every one of his experiments were discredited by the then famous John Needham: "Your experiment does not hold water, because you have boiled your flasks for an hour, and that fierce heat weakens and so damages the Vegitative Force so that it can no longer make little animals." It was Needham, not Spallanzani that was elected into the Academy of Sciences.
However with every disruptive innovation, there comes a time when people recognize that the innovation is actually better than the original... this time came with much acclaim with Pasteur's experiment with anthrax inoculations in sheep in Pouilly-de-Fort. For those who ascribed to the previous thought, there was no way for the sheep to overcome the deadly force of the blood of diseased animals. But they did. When Pasteur inoculated the sheep with his vaccination against the microbe that caused Anthrax the sheep lived and there was no anthrax microbe in their blood. Take these results and add them to the numerous discoveries made by a small town physician named Robert Koch and all of a sudden scientists have to learn a new method of scientific thought when it comes to disease.
That is how science typically goes, you have one main thought that pervades through the sciences until someone discovers that the laws that govern nature are different than we had previously supposed. I wonder what "Vegitative Forces" we hold dear in our society today that will be the annals of failed theories of the future. (will we one day see atoms as a quaint thought of the past?)
Isn't it amazing how the force of human inertia works to hold on to the already "proven" theory?
ReplyDelete